Level
1
1.0–1.99
Initial
Ad hoc and individual-driven
Experiments are isolated, sponsorship is inconsistent and outcomes depend on individual initiative.
Typical evidence
- Uncoordinated pilots
- Local data access
- Informal risk decisions
The standard · Publication 02
The levels describe increasingly deliberate, repeatable and adaptive ways of governing AI. They are cumulative: higher maturity depends on foundations established below.
Level
1
1.0–1.99
Ad hoc and individual-driven
Experiments are isolated, sponsorship is inconsistent and outcomes depend on individual initiative.
Typical evidence
Level
2
2.0–2.99
Repeatable but tactical
Useful patterns are emerging, although practices remain uneven and enterprise ownership is limited.
Typical evidence
Level
3
3.0–3.99
Documented and integrated
AI becomes an organisational capability with shared standards, defined roles and managed delivery routes.
Typical evidence
Level
4
4.0–4.99
Measured and controlled
Performance, value and risk are measured consistently across the AI portfolio and inform investment decisions.
Typical evidence
Level
5
5.0
Adaptive and strategic
Continuous improvement is embedded and AI capability is deliberately renewed as conditions change.
Typical evidence